August 14, 2023

How to fix education


Conclusion from new study: The evidence demonstrates that public school choice programs have the potential to improve school quality and reduce neighborhood-based disparities in educational opportunity.



August 11, 2023

Weiss “Special” Counsel SHAM



Appointing Weiss as the Special Counsel to take over the Weiss investigation smacks of cover-up, corruption, and the ultimate of politicalization of our justice system. 

The Weiss investigation:

1. colluded with Hunter Biden defense team to craft a sweet heart immunity deal and attempted to sneak it by the reviewing judge;

2. allowed the statue of limitations to expire on serious alleged crimes;

3. Has NOT investigated the 20’s of millions of dollars funneled to the Biden family from China, Russia, Ukraine, Romania and Kazakhstan; and,

4. Has had numerous IRS and FBI whistleblowers testify under oath that the Weiss investigation was not vigorously investigating the Bidens.

28 CFR § 600.3 - Qualifications of the Special Counsel
The Special Counsel shall be selected from outside the United States Government. 

For those that try to claim that Wiese was a US attorney appointed by Donald Trump. You should know that is in allegedly dishonest. Attorney generals have to be approved by the two senators of the state. Delaware had two Democratic Senators.






August 10, 2023

Lady Justice not so blind

Evidently in Minneapolis justice is not so blind. 

Peter Cahill - Minneapolis Judge

Every case should be about racial justice

Work for equity

Take your implicit bias training

Hire people based on their skin color

Think about race all the time, in all of your cases


https://www.dailywire.com/news/race-hustler-judge-throws-cop-in-prison-for-being-in-the-general-vicinity-when-george-floyd-died


https://twitter.com/moxlosllc/status/1689669147788034049?s=46&t=Y4fVsDnz2q8uZ3VNKeco4A


 

August 3, 2023

Is Jack Smith Lying?

Regardless of many’s hatred of Trump the rule of law is a foundation of our country with fair treatment for all. 

A portion of Jack Smith's indictment of Trump seems to be deceitful (and fraudulent?).  Will he be indicted?

He takes only the last few sentences of Trump's speech to reach a position and totally ignores context AND the directions of Trump for the protesters to be peaceful and patriotic. Why did Jack Smith fail to include this part of the speech when it was directly related to Trump's speech's first call to march to the Capital?

Errors of omission are lies non the less. 

https://twitter.com/moxlosllc/status/1687197531284066306?s=46&t=Y4fVsDnz2q8uZ3VNKeco4A

August 1, 2023

Here’s a quid pro quo


Sure looks like there was a quid pro quo between Burisma and the Biden’s.  Where’s the interest/outrage from the Democrats and Main Stream Media?

Hunter, Biden received tens of millions from Romania and China as documented by Representative Comer’s investigation. Comer’s investigation continues and is indicating they are close to being able to share the detail information on the payments from Ukraine and Russia to Hunter Biden. 

Dec. 4, 2015, Hunter Biden, Archer, I’m and two Burisma executives — Mykola Zlocevsky and Vadym Pozharskyi — were at the Four Seasons Hotel in Dubai having drinks following a Burisma board meeting. Zlochevsky told Hunter Biden that Burisma needed “help from the United States government” to deal with the pressure the company was under from Viktor Shokin, a prosecutor in Ukraine who was allegedly investigating Burisma. Hunter Biden was told to call “D.C.,”

Three days later Joe Biden traveled to Ukraine. His visit to the country was originally announced Nov. 13, 2015 to unveil an extra $1 billion in loan guarantees to help Ukraine’s economy rebuild. Instead Biden gave a speech about how corrupt Shokin, the country’s general prosecutor was, and threatened the Ukrainian government that the United States would withhold the $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees if Ukraine did not fire Shokin.

Shokin was removed from office in March 2016.

In January 2018, Joe Biden boasted about getting Shokin fired by threatening that the White House would renege on its commitment to provide aid: “I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.’ Well, son of a bitch. He got fired." 

[NOTE-similar to Russia (and China), Ukraine is a kleptocracy - a government where the powerful leaders can extract money from the country and the economy.  And while there may be hope that Ukraine was moving to a much more normal democracy eventually, there is no evidence that Ukraine wasn’t and still isn’t full of kleptocrats. What you will often see in kleptocracies is when there are new leaders in power they will prosecute previous leaders for the corruption.]

The important thing to note is Ukraine is full of corruption, and in kleptocracies “corruption” is how the powers that be can punish/remove anyone else of power. 

Way to go Joe

 Bidenomics - threatening the good faith and credit of the USA


July 28, 2023

Pots and Kettles

Does anyone else find it interesting that there is a dramatic difference between how people want to treat someone that DISCUSSED deleting information and someone that actually DID delete information.


https://twitter.com/moxlosllc/status/1685328952288546816?s=46&t=Y4fVsDnz2q8uZ3VNKeco4A

July 27, 2023

I’m ashamed

Personally I would prefer a  USA Women’s Soccer Team to be proud of our country

https://twitter.com/moxlosllc/status/1684606367607230464?s=46&t=Y4fVsDnz2q8uZ3VNKeco4A

Crooked and Corrupt


There should be DOJ employees investigated and prosecuted for this corrupt deal. 

Basically, the Biden DOJ worked hand-in-hand with Hunter Biden lawyers crafting a deal that no one else has ever gotten hiding the facts and protecting Hunter Biden from any prosecution for anything he’s done.

From Will Scharf 

Based on conversations with people who were in the courtroom today, and my experience as a former federal prosecutor, I think I know the full story of what happened with the Hunter Biden plea agreement blow-up this morning. 

Bear with me, because this is a little complicated:

Typically, if the Government is offering to a defendant that it will either drop charges or decline to bring new charges in return for the defendant's guilty plea, the plea is structured under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(A).  An agreement not to prosecute Hunter for FARA violations or other crimes in return for his pleading guilty to the tax misdemeanors, for example, would usually be a (c)(1)(A) plea.  This is open, transparent, subject to judicial approval, etc.

In Hunter's case, according to what folks in the courtroom have told me, Hunter's plea was structured under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(B), which is usually just a plea in return for a joint sentencing recommendation only, and contained no information on its face about other potential charges, and contained no clear agreement by DOJ to forego prosecution of other charges.

Instead, DOJ and Hunter's lawyers effectively hid that part of the agreement in what was publicly described as a pretrial diversion agreement relating to a § 922(g)(3) gun charge against Hunter for being a drug user in possession of a firearm.

That pretrial diversion agreement as written was actually MUCH broader than just the gun charge. If Hunter were to complete probation, the pretrial diversion agreement prevented DOJ from ever bringing charges against Hunter for any crimes relating to the offense conduct discussed in the plea agreement, which was purposely written to include his foreign influence peddling operations in China and elsewhere.

So they put the facts in the plea agreement, but put their non-prosecution agreement in the pretrial diversion agreement, effectively hiding the full scope of what DOJ was offering and Hunter was obtaining through these proceedings.  Hunter's upside from this deal was vast immunity from further prosecution if he finished a couple years of probation, and the public wouldn't be any the wiser because none of this was clearly stated on the face of the plea agreement, as would normally be the case.

Judge Noreika smelled a rat. She understood that the lawyers were trying to paint her into a corner and hide the ball. Instead, she backed DOJ and Hunter's lawyers into a corner by pulling all the details out into the open and then indicating that she wasn't going to approve a deal as broad as what she had discovered.  

DOJ, attempting to save face and save its case, then stated on the record that the investigation into Hunter was ongoing and that Hunter remained susceptible to prosecution under FARA. Hunter's lawyers exploded. They clearly believed that FARA was covered under the deal, because as written, the pretrial diversion agreement language was broad enough to cover it. They blew up the deal, Hunter pled not guilty, and that's the current state of play.

And so here we are. Hunter's lawyers and DOJ are going to go off and try to pull together a new set of agreements, likely narrower, to satisfy Judge Noreika. Fortunately, I doubt if FARA or any charges related to Hunter's foreign influence peddling will be included, which leaves open the possibility of further investigations leading to further prosecutions.


https://thefederalist.com/2023/07/31/are-the-doj-and-hunter-biden-attempting-to-commit-fraud-in-federal-court/


https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/07/hunter-bidens-sweetheart-plea-deal-blows-up/


https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-mccarthy-report/id1396508525?i=1000622567675


https://twitter.com/moxlosllc/status/1684535056155439107?s=46&t=Y4fVsDnz2q8uZ3VNKeco4A


Ineffectual

US President Joe Biden told Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that  the US will not aid any Israeli counterattack on Iran , US media report,...